<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Marc Charbonneau's Blog &#187; Internet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.mbcharbonneau.com/tag/internet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.mbcharbonneau.com</link>
	<description>Code. Cocoa. Technology.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 16:51:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Time Warner Cables&#8217;s plans to kill the Internet</title>
		<link>http://blog.mbcharbonneau.com/2009/04/11/time-warner-cabless-plans-to-kill-the-internet/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.mbcharbonneau.com/2009/04/11/time-warner-cabless-plans-to-kill-the-internet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 20:48:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marc Charbonneau</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bandwidth Caps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadband]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time Warner Cable]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mbcharbonneau.com/?p=271</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Update: Some good news for once; it looks like Time Warner Cable has capitulated on the new tiered plans. The language seems to indicate they might try it again in the future, hopefully if they do they&#8217;ll make the bandwidth caps more sensible for consumers. If you&#8217;ve followed technology news this month you&#8217;ve probably heard [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Update:</strong> Some good news for once; it looks like Time Warner Cable <a href="http://stopthecap.com/2009/04/16/we-won-time-warner-killing-usage-caps-in-all-markets/">has capitulated on the new tiered plans</a>. The language seems to indicate they might try it again in the future, hopefully if they do they&#8217;ll make the bandwidth caps more sensible for consumers.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;ve followed technology news this month you&#8217;ve probably heard about Time Warner Cable&#8217;s plan to expand its new bandwidth caps to four other cities, including (of personal importance to me) Rochester, NY. The idea of capped broadband isn&#8217;t exactly new, but TWC&#8217;s plans (ranging from 5GB to 40GB) haven&#8217;t taken long to draw criticism from customers and journalists.</p>
<p>The plans are, simply put, bad. I&#8217;m not even really against the &#8220;pay-as-you-go&#8221; pricing model. I use a lot of bandwidth and would prefer unlimited access, sure, but I can see the argument of having reasonable metered usage fees. The difference is that TWC&#8217;s usage fees are not reasonable; it&#8217;s hard to see them as anything but protecting their traditional cable TV subscriptions from new services such as Hulu and Netflix&#8217;s downloadable service. TWC&#8217;s tiers are priced as if it&#8217;s still the 90s, but with Mozy, Hulu, Netflix, Steam and so on it&#8217;s easy for someone to greatly exceed the bandwidth cap with only legitimate usage. This is no longer something that&#8217;s only going to affect only technical users or media bootleggers.</p>
<p>At best, Time Warner Cable is hurting their own customers in order to protect their cable TV subscriptions. At worst, this is something that&#8217;s going to hurt a lot of emerging online business markets as their customer base on TWC (and other ISPs that follow them) are reduced or eliminated.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not all bad news though. New York state congressman Eric Massa announced he&#8217;s <a href="http://stopthecap.com/2009/04/07/breaking-news-rep-eric-massa-d-ny-condemns-time-warner-internet-cap-will-take-lead-role-in-opposition/">drafting legislation</a> that will prohibit the bandwidth caps. Time Warner Cable also seems to be adjusting the new plans in response to the bad press they&#8217;re receiving, including introducing a new &#8220;unlimited&#8221; tier for $150 per month. Still, at three times the cost for the same service subscribers have now, it&#8217;s a pretty small gesture.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s going to be interesting to see how this plays out over the next year. If it&#8217;s something you care about, I&#8217;d suggest dropping Time Warner Cable if you&#8217;re a subscriber (and telling your friends and family to do the same) and supporting any local legislation aimed at preventing this sort of thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.mbcharbonneau.com/2009/04/11/time-warner-cabless-plans-to-kill-the-internet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced)
Database Caching 6/13 queries in 0.034 seconds using disk

Served from: blog.mbcharbonneau.com @ 2012-02-04 23:33:20 -->
